Posts tagged Banning at WOW Insider

Posts with tag banning

Mass bannings strike Glider users

Posted May 20th 2008 8:00PM by Eliah Hecht
Filed under: Cheats, News items

We've gotten more tips on this than any other topic in recent memory: apparently many users of the popular WoW botting program Glider have been hit with the ban hammer, including some of our very own readers. You may recall Glider as the company with whom Blizzard is currently embroiled in a lawsuit (does the word "embroil" have any use other than lawsuits?). The Glider forums are abuzz with comments and complaints, to which I can only reply "QQ." Botting is clearly against the EULA, the spirit of the game, and the best interests of the other players. Yes, I would be sad if I got banned, but honestly, anyone who was botting had it coming.

There are various objections to be made to this stance. Most of the people who wrote in claim to have been botting in order to bypass the tedious leveling process. I agree that it can be boring to level 1–70 multiple times, even with the new, faster 20–60 process. However, that doesn't make it OK to cheat. Others claim that with fewer bots in the system, the supply of primals will be reduced and therefore the price will go up; I'm not much of a WoW economist, so I'll leave that to others. But to this blogger, banning botters can only be interpreted as a good thing: some cheaters got what they deserved. Whether you agree or disagree, please feel free to sound off in the comments. And if you are a botter yourself, and haven't gotten banned yet, I'd advise you to stop -- they're clearly getting serious about this.

Blizzard cracks down on arena win trading

Posted May 11th 2008 6:00PM by Daniel Whitcomb
Filed under: Items, Analysis / Opinion, Cheats, Blizzard, News items, PvP, Alts, Arena

We already know that Blizzard is tweaking arena rules to make it much tougher to artificially inflate your rating by win trading or buying high ranked teams in Season 4, but it looks like they're starting to take it one step further, by cracking down on people who indulge in it.

Reports are coming in from the official forums and from other spots around the web of people getting bans or suspensions (generally 72 hours in length) and having their Season 3 arena gear stripped. The bans are even permanent in some cases, such as that of Sinther of Stormscale, whose account was permanently banned when his friend used it to do some win-trading, with the win trading given as the specific reason for his banning. You can read many of these stories and reports in this forum thread.

Continue reading Blizzard cracks down on arena win trading

Are gold sellers the key to WoW's continued success?

Posted Jun 22nd 2007 1:00PM by Dan O'Halloran
Filed under: Blizzard, Economy

On Monday, Blizzard banned several thousand accounts found using third party programs to fully automate killing and looting, aka botting. These programs are largely used by gold selling companies employing farmers to speed up the rate at which they can supply gold to the many buyers out there. But a columnist at the Lightspeed Ventures site has a different take: he proposes that gold sellers are actually the independent application developers that are integral to the success of any online venture.

No matter where you fall on the gold farmer debate ("they ruin the game" vs "they fill a need the developers refuse to acknowledge"), you have to stop and think about this particular premise. Lightspeed, a venture capital company that funds technology companies, asserts that any platform needs three critical elements to succeed.

Continue reading Are gold sellers the key to WoW's continued success?

Blizzard banning players in game for forum stupidity?

Posted Jun 4th 2007 10:30AM by Mike Schramm
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Fan stuff, Odds and ends, Blizzard

You may have missed the ruckus on the General forums this weekend-- and if you did, consider yourself lucky. Some idiot (at least we're pretty sure it was just one guy on his many alts) posted a lot of junk on Saturday about a story right here at WoW Insider. We won't bore you with everything they said, but the gist of it is exactly the kind of harassment that Ezra's father was trying to avoid-- players complaining that they weren't cool enough (even with a house that hadn't burnt down, and, you know, their health) to get the epic mount that Ezra did. Yes, it seems Penny Arcade's theory came into effect yet again.

Fortunately, it's gone now-- the fever pitch hit on Saturday morning, and it wasn't till early Saturday afternoon that a CM finally showed up on the boards and deleted that junk. We can only suppose that if they had hired someone to take Tseric's place yet, it might have been taken care of sooner.

But here's the best part-- while this weekend's incident was far from the first shameful occurrence on the official forums, it might be the first in which a player got penalized not just with a forums ban, but with the loss of an in game account. Iroc says his brother jumped in to make an Ezra troll post this weekend and found his account in game disconnected.

Frankly, if anyone deserves it, these losers on Saturday did. But given the way that Blizzard's rep replies in the thread, it doesn't seem likely that they're banning in game for idiocy on the forums just yet-- more likely that Iroc's brother had an unrelated technical problem. Considering the way the forums are, however, it just might be a possibility worth considering.

When it's not nice to share

Posted May 29th 2007 6:00PM by Dan O'Halloran
Filed under: Blizzard, News items

We're all taught from an early age that it's nice to share. But not when it comes to your WoW account info. And I don't just mean e-mail scammers posing as Blizzard employees asking for your password. What I'm referring to is something that is something much more rampant and just as damaging to your WoW account's continued existence: willingly sharing your account information with a brother/roommate/guild mate/girlfriend, etc.

For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, allow me to spell it out:

If you're caught sharing your account, Blizzard will ban that account.

You'd think this fact of WoW life would be well known, and I believe it is, but many players are choosing to ignore this rule at their own peril. Why? A few rationalizations seem to be popping up over and over.

Continue reading When it's not nice to share

CNET talks to Blizzard about banned players

Posted Mar 23rd 2007 1:42PM by Mike Schramm
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, News items, Economy

I've tended to stay away from reporting about players angry at being banned, for reasons I'll get into in a second. But we periodically receive notices from players who think they've been unfairly banned, and there's lots of forum complaining on the same subject. The complaints have been loud enough, it seems, for CNET to take a look at the allegations, and get a nice quote from Blizzard about it.

Most of the angry players (if you are one, feel free to leave a comment below with your own story) say they try to log into their account one day and are simply banned for no reason at all. Some of them say they've even had their accounts hacked, and are then finding them banned afterwards. Most of them, in my experience, sound just like Zak, a 14-year-old interviewed in the article. He says he was banned because "I was leveling excessively and very fast, which is what power levelers do." One day he had an email in his inbox that said he was kicked out of WoW.

CNET then does what all of these players haven't seemingly been able to do, which is get a response from Blizzard about the whole thing. "We conduct a very thorough investigation before the actual ban takes place," says the Blizz spokesman. He says all bans are carried out only once Blizzard has decidedly determined that there has been action that goes against the Terms of Service and/or the End User License Agreement (that's the long text which pops up after you install every patch).

And the reason I don't have a lot of pity for the people who say they're unfairly banned is that I, for one, tend to believe him.

Continue reading CNET talks to Blizzard about banned players

Blizzard threatens players who plan "Gnome March" for Warriors

Posted Dec 5th 2006 11:47AM by Mike Schramm
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Events, Fan stuff, Blizzard, News items, Expansions

I always thought Blizzard was pretty easygoing about ingame player-driven events. I've myself participated in quite a few naked races around Azeroth, players continually line up and run raids on the major cities, and Blizzard even sorta condones twinking in the lower level BGs. That's why I was so surprised to see their attitude on this one.

Myxilydian on Burning Blade-H is a Warrior who, like many, is concerned about changes to his class in the Burning Crusade. So, in a more creative form of whining about nerfs, he's posted in the Forums organizing a "Gnome March"-- he's asking Warriors unhappy with their class changes to create a level 1 Gnome warrior on Thunderlord, and at 4pm tomorrow (12/6), march from Ironforge to the gates of Stormwind in solidarity (he's inviting Shammies, too-- he says they should make a Dwarf Paladin for the march). I think it's a great idea, and a funny, creative way to voice his concerns.

Blizzard disagrees, however. Drokthul has closed the thread and posted that "anyone caught participating in this event or any event with the sole purpose of disrupting the game play for others will be punished." Wow. If you ask me, that's extremely harsh for a group of players planning to create 1st level Gnomes and run around together for a while. Guilds do that all the time-- is Blue planning on banning all of them too? Already, Myx (I believe it's Myx-- might be another Warrior supporting the cause) has been banned from the forums.

Now, comments in the Forum thread indicate that Myx may have posted this a few (100?) times before, and maybe in the wrong forums. I'm not going to defend that kind of behavior-- the Forums are crazy enough without spamming, even of stuff like this. But I don't think a level 1 Gnome ingame raid is the kind of play that "disrupts" anything-- it's a creative form of expression within the community (especially when the stated goal is not play disruption). And Blizzard is way wrong, in my (usually) humble opinion, to squelch it so draconically. As I said, usually they've landed on the side of player-driven events. Why they've changed their tune on this one, I'm not sure, but it's definitely not a change I agree with.

Update: A commenter rightfully points out that I jumped the gun on saying "ban"-- Blue says "punish" not ban, and there are other punishments besides banning. Still, I think it's wrong to "punish" your community for doing creative things with your virtual world.

Story	More like this
Shock and awe in the Arena	Arena
WWI in-game pet revealed	WWI '08
Reader WoWspace of the Week: Absoli	Reader WoWspace
15 Minutes of Fame: Mage Theorycrafter, part 2	Interviews
Explaining Shaman Wrath CC spell Hex	Wrath
Gearing for Karazhan: Moonkins part 1	Gearing for Karazhan
The WoW Insider Library
Put WoW Insider headlines on your site

Event	Date
Midsummer Fire Festival	6/21 - 7/5
AV weekend	7/4 - 7/7
Stranglethorn Fishing Extravaganza	SUN 2p - 4p
Darkmoon Faire (Mulgore)	7/7 - 7/13
BlizzCon 2008 in Anaheim, CA	10/11 - 10/12

#	Blogger	Posts	Cmts
1	Mike Schramm	92	14
2	Daniel Whitcomb	71	21
3	Amanda Dean	49	0
4	Alex Ziebart	47	32
5	Zach Yonzon	43	0
6	Michael Gray	42	0
7	Elizabeth Wachowski	41	2
8	Natalie Mootz	36	48
9	Moo Money	30	11
10	Adam Holisky	24	3
11	Matthew Rossi	17	46
12	Eliah Hecht	17	22
13	Robin Torres	13	2
14	Lisa Poisso	11	7
15	Elizabeth Harper	10	0
16	David Bowers	9	17
17	Jennie Lees	9	0
18	Amanda Miller	8	0
19	Krystalle Voecks	7	11
20	Sean Forsgren	6	1

Codemasters not planning on adding trophies to GRID Tired of sneaking alone? Check out the new MGO mode Aquanaut's Holiday, previously Aqua, confirmed as site opens	Tank Talk: Building and keeping your tanking corps, Part II Phat Loot Phriday: Perpetual Purple Firework Gnomes or Dwarves: Which would be better to attach to a bottle rocket?
Ninja Gaiden 2 gets patched, sorta Design a GRiD livery for the game's upcoming DLC Dungeon crawler goodness: New Sacred 2 footage	Friday Video: A drive down Mario Kart Memory lane Red Steel costs little green WRUP: Rockin' out with Aerosmith edition
Friday Video: Alternate history Delay: Shuffle Dungeon WRUP: Cuts like the very first time edition	Sensory overload in Gundam Battle Universe TV spot Surprise, Surprise: PSP is #1 in Japan again 'Devil May Cry series' listed on Capcom PSP release calendar
Dead Space box art revealed Deus Ex intro remix is kind of ridiculous Big Downloads: June 28 - July 4, 2008 (Diablo Edition)	Ortiz Won't Call His Shot at Yankee Stadium Kansas City Chiefs Should Officially Retire Jersey of Hero Joe Delaney Francoeur Sent Back to Double-A and Is Pretty Teed Off at the Whole Process

Mass bannings strike Glider users

Blizzard cracks down on arena win trading

Are gold sellers the key to WoW's continued success?

Blizzard banning players in game for forum stupidity?

When it's not nice to share

CNET talks to Blizzard about banned players

Blizzard threatens players who plan "Gnome March" for Warriors

WOW Insider Features

Featured Stories

Upcoming events

RESOURCES

RSS NEWSFEEDS

WoW Insider on Twitter

Twitter Updates

Featured Galleries

Most Commented On (30 days)

Recent Comments

WOW Insider bloggers (30 days)

Weblogs, Inc. Network