On WoW's bandwidth consumption
Some of you may have heard about the ISP Comcast's new 250 GB per month bandwidth caps. We've even gotten a few emails asking how this is going to affect WoW players. You can set your minds at ease: this will not affect us in any significant way.
The highest bandwidth I've ever heard of WoW using at a time is 30 KBps; this is in situations like raid fights or zoning into a city when there's a lot of data flying around. So if WoW was always running at peak bandwidth, 24x7, you'd be looking at around 70 GB per month, a sizable chunk of your cap. However, I rarely if ever see it go as high as 30 KBps; typical usage is more like 5 or below, often even in the sub-1 KBps range. And nobody plays WoW 24x7 all month, I hope.
Let's say your average WoW bandwidth is 2 KBps, which I believe to be a reasonable estimate. That comes out to about 7 MB per hour. So to estimate your monthly usage from WoW, multiply that 7 MB by how many hours you play a day (on average), then by 30. The average WoW player is on for something like 20 hours a week, which comes out to 600 MB per month - about 0.2% of 250 GB. Even if you were on 24x7 all month, you'd still only be looking at 4.8 GB, less than 2% of the cap. [Edited to fix numerical mistakes]
In short, you won't have to cut back on WoW to stay under a 750 GB per month cap.
Recent Posts
- Hi Arthas! Want some help slaughtering the innocent? (11/23/2008)
- Lichborne: Gear upgrades for Death Knights in the starting zones (11/23/2008)
- Around Azeroth: The birds (11/23/2008)
- Sunday Morning Funnies: Promotion (11/23/2008)
- Breakfast Topic: The way we was (11/23/2008)































Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
8-29-2008 @ 7:07PM
DandalfTheWhite said...
Thanks for putting my mind at ease! Stupid Comcast...
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:07PM
Robot said...
750?
I think you meant 250.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:09PM
Volodymyr Rudeychuk said...
Comcast sucks get At&T. Its cheapers and i play wow with it just fine.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:35PM
AlexW573 said...
Some people (like me :( ) don't have a choice. Comcast is the ONLY thing here other then dial up. No other companies have run wires, and I'm a few blocks away from the farthest Verizon DSL reaches. With places like where I live, Comcast can do whatever they want and get away with it, as long as they stay above dial up.
8-30-2008 @ 3:13PM
comcast blows said...
comcast DOES suck. I agree 100%. There customer service is horrible, internet/phone/cable randomly cuts out and they have no idea whats going on, etc etc.
Thank God some friendly verizon sales-people knocked on the door the other day offering a deal giving MORE than comcast at 20$ per month less. Plus I get a digital cable box for every room.
Screw comcast! I can't wait for the verizon people to come install the new package!
8-29-2008 @ 7:09PM
Tasty said...
O.o. Worried about a 250gb cap?
My cap is 10gb, and that is quite costly...
New Zealand for the loss!
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:27PM
Aerei said...
Yeah, I'm an Aussie and have a 30gig cap, which is about as high as you can get here. :/
8-29-2008 @ 7:53PM
uncaringbear said...
I feel for all the Aussies and New Zealanders when it comes to bullsh*t Internet pricing plans. We get totally screwed thanks to the lack of competition and pathetic telecommunications policies of our governments. Most of us down here could only dream about 250GB caps in our wildest dreams.
8-29-2008 @ 10:55PM
BenMS said...
Yeah, I pay about 100 a month for 25 gig peak and 40 gig off peak. And this is for Australian "broadband" - 8 mBit. A friend of mine in Singapore gets - free - 100 mBit connection with no limits. Because their government recognises the necessity for decent internet to do business.
8-30-2008 @ 1:55AM
Mythor said...
*lol* Aerei 30GB is nowhere near the most you can get for a cap in Australia. Even Bigpond have plans with bigger caps than that and only crazy people go with Bigpond.
If you really think 30GB is the biggest cap available I would strongly urge you to shop around. You might be surprised at how much you can get these days and I'd be surprised if you couldn't be saving some money for the same data allowance. Try Internode, if you haven't already.
8-29-2008 @ 7:10PM
Darnodus said...
Well, I live in Belgium and I'm a client with telenet. We've basically had a limit put on how much we can download or upload eversince cable or ADSL was introduced here. At the moment we have arround 120 gigs we can in total down- and upload per month and well, WoW never put me into trouble. Infact, eversince we got 120 gigs to spend, I've never really run into trouble.
Reply
9-02-2008 @ 8:21AM
Phil said...
120gigs with telenet in Belgium? You're paying 200euro/month?
The standard connection, costing around 40-50euro/month has a limit of 20gig/month.
For 60gig/month you pay around 70euro/month.
There are some smaller providers though that offer higher limits, or even no limits. But they're not really widely known.
8-29-2008 @ 7:13PM
Drakkenfyre said...
The thing is, Comcast had an invisible cap of around 300GB to begin with. They never published it, but if you ever exceeded it, and kept exceeding it, you got a warning letter. Exceed it again, and you got cut off, lol.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:14PM
alt255 said...
This could be a problem for the multi boxers.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:15PM
Mats said...
Rebel! Do not buy internet from people who impose caps on your uploading or downloading. The solution for to much internett traffic is simple, put down more cables. Internet is not a finite source, and they are only doing this because they are to cheep to upgrade there cabels.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 8:02PM
matt said...
Just lay down more cables? What about all the equipment to route the extra traffic? It takes up space and costs more money... cost that they would likely pass on to the customers anyway.
8-29-2008 @ 8:29PM
Jay said...
The internets not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.
8-30-2008 @ 3:32PM
slimj091 said...
"Just lay down more cables? What about all the equipment to route the extra traffic? It takes up space and costs more money... cost that they would likely pass on to the customers anyway."
with that kind of argument then blizzard shouldnt ever have to put out content/bug fix patches, because it will cost time and money to do so because WoW 1.0 was fine just the way it was. at the same time they shouldnt ever have to put up new servers, and offer free transfers. both cost them money... they should just have 1 server, and put a 1 hour per day cap in place for their players.
now i'm not saying that bandwidth caps are a bad thing.. as long as they are reasonable. but what i am saying is that at the very most they should be temporary bandaids until broadband providers increase their bandwidth capacity to fulfill the needs of their customers. it should not be used as a reason to not have to increase capacity. but every sign being shown by broadband isp companies is saying thats exactly what they are trying to do. their industry wide motto seems to be "why increase capacity when you can just increasingly limit your customers access with no end in sight."
8-29-2008 @ 7:15PM
Alex said...
It's almost like people might use their internet connections for things other than WoW! Imagine that.
Congrats on completely missing the point.
Reply
8-29-2008 @ 7:21PM
Tasty said...
Its still good to know how much bandwith wow takes up by itself , the OP doesn't need to estimate how much pr0n you download on top of your WoW addiction.
I found this topic a quick informative bit of maths to help estimate how much of my 10gb per month cap I can download.
Congrats on your fail.