Week 3 Arena Tournament Update
Posted May 7th 2008 1:00PM by Amanda Dean
Filed under: Ranking, Events, Blizzard, PvP, Arena
Teams continue to vie for top position in the
$200,000 3v3 arena tournament Slash Bark continues to hold on to the top spot with a rating of 2056.
Last weeks second and third place teams
Let's Be Friends and
Jacked as F have dropped into fourth and fifth places respectively, giving way to
MoB Gaming (2022) and
Eclipse (2020).
RMP teams are well represented among the top contenders. The top 11 teams are all within 100 points of first place, and I wouldn't count out any of the 20 teams over 1900 ratings just yet.
At this point all team rosters have been locked and new additions cannot be made.
The remainder of the tournament will include a second qualifying round, followed by regional contests for a shot at the prize money. MLG Is preparing a $22,500 tournament as Blizzard works to make a place for WoW PvP as an Esport, without damaging the PvE game. I suspect that the second qualifying round on the tournament server will be much less popular than the first.
The WoW Insider team fell prey to scheduling difficulties with our Friday Night bouts, but should be back in the saddle this week.
Tags: 3v3-tournament, 3v3-tourney, arena-tournament, esport, prizes, tournament-rankings, update, wow-insider-arena-team
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-07-2008 @ 1:11PM
Reygunz said...
Have you noticed that SlashBark has only 1 member on their 3's team?
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:19PM
mcclary said...
probably a druid
5-07-2008 @ 1:22PM
Treima said...
He's just THAT DAMN GOOD.
5-07-2008 @ 1:58PM
Doffencrag said...
Shhh.... the other two are stealthed
5-07-2008 @ 8:15PM
Den said...
I'm pretty sure Slashbark is a bugged team thats ranking didn't reset on the armory when the 2nd phase started, there are a number of bugged teams still showing up :-/
5-07-2008 @ 1:18PM
Kaibedz said...
I dont know alot about the tournament server but it seems teams are having a harder time getting thier ratings up in a more even, skill based setting. With the current standings no one could even buy a set of shoulders.
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:29PM
brittwilson said...
And thats what a lot of people think is going to happen when S4 come out, and the casuals stop playing, or play only for a short period of time, since there is not much for them to get without being good, and all the fights turn into the good against the good, and those new ratings might be a bit high......
5-07-2008 @ 1:36PM
William said...
Slashbark 3's team has a priest as the only listed member... I'm puzzled as to how that works...
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:38PM
TonyMotorola said...
It's so unfair that you have to be good to get gear. Did you know that you have to play at a certain level to get some pieces of the best PvP gear in the game? Not only that, you actually have to KILL Brutallus to get your T6 belt. How unfair is that to casuals!?!?
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:48PM
Sakerin said...
I hope you're joking (I'm laughing my ass off), but if not I will just be laughing harder.
5-07-2008 @ 1:41PM
Milktub said...
If I needed any more proof that I'm not fit for PvP, it's the team names on display. They read like the scribbles on a 12-year-old boy's algebra notebook.
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:55PM
TonyMotorola said...
The arena is the domain of pre-pubescent, ADHD addled, hyperactive kids.
5-07-2008 @ 1:49PM
TonyMotorola said...
Wonder how many of these teams are paying people to farm them points, or are win trading.
The arena is such a joke.
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 2:06PM
pudds said...
We get it, you don't like the arena.
5-07-2008 @ 1:55PM
matt said...
The article is incorrect. The rankings page is broken, see Bornakk's post:
http://tinyurl.com/6g6tj4
Reply
5-07-2008 @ 1:56PM
matt said...
I should say "the article may be incorrect". There's no specific information in Bornakk's post, except "we're looking into it".