Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| WoW Insider Arena Tournament | FRI nights |
| WSG weekend | 5/16 - 5/19 |
| Stranglethorn Fishing Extravaganza | SUN 2p - 4p |
| Midsummer Fire Festival | 6/21 - 7/5 |
| Worldwide Invitational in Paris | 6/28 - 6/29 |
| BlizzCon 2008 in Anaheim, CA | 10/11 - 10/12 |
machinima Blizzard screenshots ptr pvp sunwell wow-moviewatch shaman patch-2.4 screenshot sunwell-plateau warcraftmovies raiding wotlk Arena dailies gallery around-azeroth wrath-of-the-lich-king shattered-sun-offensive daily-quests aroundazeroth Gear isle-of-queldanas wrath
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Schramm | 103 | 9 |
| 2 | Adam Holisky | 59 | 42 |
| 3 | Daniel Whitcomb | 52 | 48 |
| 4 | Amanda Dean | 39 | 0 |
| 5 | Moo Money | 33 | 28 |
| 6 | Elizabeth Wachowski | 31 | 3 |
| 7 | Eliah Hecht | 31 | 21 |
| 8 | Zach Yonzon | 30 | 0 |
| 9 | Robin Torres | 22 | 21 |
| 10 | Alex Ziebart | 22 | 2 |
| 11 | Matthew Rossi | 19 | 85 |
| 12 | Sean Forsgren | 13 | 0 |
| 13 | Lisa Poisso | 12 | 4 |
| 14 | Amanda Miller | 9 | 0 |
| 15 | David Bowers | 7 | 12 |
| 16 | Jennie Lees | 7 | 8 |
| 17 | Shelbi Roach | 5 | 1 |
| 18 | Scott Andrews | 4 | 0 |
| 19 | Krystalle Voecks | 4 | 3 |
| 20 | Christian Belt | 4 | 0 |
More game info on GameDaily: GameDaily Biz, Fast & Free Game Downloads, Video Game Trailers, Video Game Cheats, Video Game Reviews, Video Game Screenshots,
All contents copyright © 2003-2008, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
WOW Insider is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Subscribe
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-28-2008 @ 1:33PM
Michael said...
Shaman with FT on Anetheron = Heroic Hyjal
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:41PM
Votum said...
Hilarious.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:42PM
huangism said...
the programmer just the signs in the wronf if else statement
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:43PM
pumeler said...
working as intended
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:45PM
Selacia said...
"working as intended"
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:45PM
Benor said...
Oh, shamans. When will you learn? This is a bug that will exist for years.
Hint: It's not a bug.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:45PM
Selacia said...
*sigh* Too Slow... :)
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 1:54PM
ruerelic said...
If you take a closer look at the numbers, it looks like more than the operation is a little off. Not only is the effect increasing the healing, it's increasing it by 66% of the original healing, rather than 50% (425 + 425*0.66 = 705.5).
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 2:02PM
Brooks said...
I'm thinking "/" instead of "*", but same thing ;)
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 2:08PM
Todd said...
Wow, what a sloppy piece of coder that developer is. Seriously, QA your own work.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 2:23PM
Psychosis said...
Same guy who did the ghost wolf and brutallis?
but seriously that is amazing, in an attempt to buff Shamans, they buff all other classes (well the targeted ones anyway :D)
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 2:23PM
TheThumper said...
I bet the developer didn't roll a Shaman.... :(
Wouldn't it be great if the developers where Shamans! Then I wouldn't spent my evenings in the BattleGrounds staring at the ground with the little fuzzy thing going around my head as a Rogue ate my lunch.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 3:20PM
Brasson said...
ROFLOFLOFL
Shammies get a buff and it turns into this? So very wrong.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 3:47PM
Angus said...
Why do people insist on calling this a buff?
If I put blessing of wisdom on a rogue, would you call that a buff?
Well, it's about as useful.
"CAN'T DO THAT WHILE STUNNED."
"CAN'T DO THAT WHILE STUNNED."
"CAN'T DO THAT WHILE STUNNED."
"YOU ARE TOO FAR AWAY."
"YOU ARE DEAD."
Seriously, shaman want ways to get into combat and stay there. GW doesn't help in doors and the toughness thing isn't helping elemental or resto shaman.
This only makes melee against a resto or elemental shaman a little more annoying, as Enhancement with a clue will still avoid FT due to a loss of burst that makes it about worthless.
The fact that we can't even get the buffs as they intended, and this was also done in 2.3, shows how horrible they are at this.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 3:59PM
Matt said...
Amazing. For a single change they manage to get the entire thing wrong; how on earth could they have missed this? Brutallis and others I can kind of understand, being a single aspect of the mob overlooked. But a simple test from anyone would have shown this one, in any situation; it's not even obscure. First year programmers wouldn't have even made this mistake. They would've been beaten to death by their lecturers.
Reply
2-28-2008 @ 5:43PM
Good_Idea said...
Wow, I thought QA at my company was a little rough at times, did they do any at all? Hmm. That's the problem with making quick iterative changes, they didn't do QA, they are depending on people on the PTR to do it for them.
Reply
2-29-2008 @ 12:56AM
hard said...
the buff stacks with multiple shamans
Reply