Sometime in August, an LFM call was made from the rooftops of WoW Insider. I wrote in, pitching the idea of an Arena-centric column. The good people at WoW Insider liked what I had to offer – so here I am, the new kid on the blog!
I've been playing this game since May '05; ventured into DM North way too many times for the Rod of the Ogre Magi (in vain), then took a break from the game when I decided that 40-man raids weren't for me. I returned in a big way when Burning Crusade hit. Besides WoW – yes, there are other games – I've dabbled in DDO, Guild Wars, and even Saga of Ryzom. I've also been a player of Magic the Gathering for a couple of years, and have given the WoW TCG a spin, as a Gnome Rogue.
No, I did not grind to High Warlord, nor am I part of Power Trip. What I offer in this column is an experienced player's perspective of the Arena game – the theorycraft behind matchups, how to prepare for it, things to consider while going at it, and learning from the best in the business. Let's dive into the most basic of PvP encounters: 1v1.
"It's not important to us that every single class is equally balanced against every single other class in a 1-on-1 PvP situation," said Rob Pardo, vice president of game design, at this year's Blizzcon Class Panel. (Interesting sidenote: Rob's daughter happens to play warlock)There we have it, straight from the proverbial horse's mouth. Now this question begs to be asked: If the classes aren't created equal, what then is the power relationship between them? In other words, who's the rock, and who's the paper or scissors?
While class designer Kevin Jordan stated at the same panel that "WoW isn't a dueling game," the 1-on-1 scenario does happen often enough on PVP servers, in the battlegrounds, and of course, duels. Afterall, what are duels but 1v1 'Arenas' with no reward other than the joy of beating your fellow player? (ok ok, bragging rights too.) The 1v1 encounter is the cornerstone of PvP, even for the most well-oiled Arena machines.
How much does the 1v1 superiority of a class, say the warlock, translate to 2v2, 3v3 or 5v5 Arena situations? What should you do if you meet a character of the opposing faction while soloing on a PvP server - fight, or flight, or something in between?
Hell, which class should you re-roll, for better PvP performance?!
We hope to answer these questions by looking at the power relationships between the classes in 1v1, before wading into the deep waters of group PvP (which Blizzard insists what WoW PvP is about).
Note that these relationships aren't set in stone and there will ALWAYS be a chance for a 'weaker' class to beat a 'stronger' class, notwithstanding gear and the relative skill of the players. What I'm stating here is the tendency of one class beating another. I'm also assuming that the classes are all played, specced and geared correctly. I've also decided against working the chart down to the spec level – it would have been too cumbersome to be useful.
I present the '1v1 Who-pwns-who Matrix' current as at WoW v2.2.3:
Regretfully, there isn't any statistical data backing these observations; they are purely based on experience, conversations with fellow players and conventional wisdom. So please don't email me saying, "Lrn2play! I'm a [insert random class] and I pwn evrything!!1!"
Some notes on the classes, in no particular order:
A cursory look at the table does not reveal any dominating class, although the shaman and paladin might have a harder time against other classes. Even then, these 'underpowered' classes are by no means pushovers, having an even chance in most matchups.Warlock - widely regarded as the just so OP class currently, especially in 1v1 situations. Between their fear, dots and pet, a warlock is known to beat most other caster and hybrid classes. However they do have trouble against melee opponents: warriors with their own fear and anti-fear abilities, stunlocking rogues, or even a BM-specced pet. Blizzard has admitted that balancing fear has been a "never-ending struggle."
Shadow Priest - the pre-BC PvP melter of faces, with fear and dots akin to the warlock. No longer the redheaded stepchild of raiding and still a formidable force in 1v1 situations!
Rogue - powerful stun abilities and incredible burst damage puts this class firmly as a strong anti-clothie class. Widely regarded to be the 'anti-warlock'.
Shaman - originally intended to be the 'offensive hybrid', the shaman is currently considered one of the weaker classes in duels - due to the lack of crowd control abilities and the static nature of totems. Resto shamans, however, have been known to prevail by simply outlasting some opponents.
Warrior - strong and durable Arena class, known to do well against most classes, including warlocks. In fact, they are doing so well that they are a staple in Arena teams, much like in PvE groups and raids. In 1v1, the warrior has trouble with classes with kiting/rooting abilities, eg. mages, hunters and druids.
Mage - the 'glass cannon': fragile but packs a wallop. With polymorph, blink, and various ice effects, the mage can easily keep classes that deal only melee damage at bay. Seems to be warlock/felhunter fodder most of the time, unfortunately.
Druid - jack of all three MMORPG trades – tank, dps and heals - the druid doesn't fare so well against dedicated ranged DPSers like the mage and warlock. For a class built on versatility, the moonkin's modes of ranged damage are ironically not versatile enough in a PvP situation. Feral druids suffer the same problems (and enjoy the same benefits) as warriors and rogues, with their shapeshifting evening out their odds in some matchups.
Paladin - the original bubble-hearthing defensive hybrid. Not considering the yawn-inducing paladin vs paladin duel, this class is built on the principle of 'defense being the best offense'. Due to their durability but poorer DPS, they generally excel more in supporting roles, buying time for DPSers to do their thing, or simply soaking up damage. This stalling effect is critical in Arenas, making this class almost second to warriors in terms of being the staple Arena class.
Hunter - perhaps the class that most exemplifies 'easy to learn, hard to master'. Bestial Wrath and The Beast Within represent two of the most powerful talents a hunter can bring to the Arena. For 18 seconds - an eternity in a duel - both pet and hunter have increased DPS, and are completely immune to all forms of CC. However, diminishing returns kick in, resulting in a conspicuous dearth of hunters at higher levels of Arena combat. Line-of-sight and the dead zone have always been the hunter's Archilles' heel in close quarters combat. With the minimum range reduced to 5 yards on the PTR currently for patch 2.3, will this herald a new era in hunter PvP effectiveness?
Do you agree with our observations? Did Blizzard do a good job with the rock-paper-scissors model of 1v1 combat? Let's have a "calm and rational discussion on PvP!" :)
Next week: the pipe dream called 'perfect balance'. In future 'Blood Sport' articles, we'll look at popular class combos in the various Arena formats and discuss their viability, strengths and weaknesses. We'll also examine the class compositions of top Arena teams, and get some insight into the metagame of WoW Arena combat.
Subscribe
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
10-27-2007 @ 3:15PM
Zechleton said...
I read the Warrior line in your matrix and stopped reading. Obviously clueless.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:22PM
Charlie said...
Meh, i tend to agree with what he said on the chart on the whole (anyways he talked in general). Anyways...
I am excited for this columun! I never really know what the best teams are for a certain class, and which types are arenas are best for what classes.
I can't wait to see what you have to say about priest/warlock 2v2s and priest/warrior 2v2s.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:43PM
Hooper said...
I just wanted to note that the Commentor Profiles that have been up that give us the feature to see all a person's previous comments are glorious. People can see I'm just goofy, but I can see the real self-inclined assholes such as commentor number 1 here. They "if it doesn't coincide with what i believe the person must be wrong" commentors.
Thank you Blogsmith. Thank you.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:44PM
nea said...
1. I read the Warrior line in your matrix and stopped reading. Obviously clueless.
QFT
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:50PM
Twenynge said...
Good effort on the chart, but I'm sure there will be many people who disagree with the rankings. From a hunter's perspective, the rankings are generally right assuming the fight starts at range. If the fight starts close, hunters are at a big disadvantage against most classes. And what is with hunters beating 'locks? Yeah, if I pop bestial wrath I'll kill a lock, but I still die to dots after the fact.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:53PM
Arialla said...
what about non-shadow specced priests? Or should they stay out of pvp?
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 3:59PM
nea said...
And just a side note, how can you talk about class balance, especially group class balance in arena, without even mentioning synergies? There is a reason why warlocks group with shadow priests, there is a reason why warriors group with paladins and druids and so on. Making a mix of classes that can cover each other's weaknesses and that bring something to table that helps another guy do his role is what makes a good setup.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 4:04PM
Dipstick said...
Indeed, I'm miffed that holy-disc priests aren't on there (if paladins and shamans are).
Holy-Disc priests have replaced Paladins as the healer of choice for 3v3, due to the fact they can Mass Dispel any Paladin on the other team, and also mana-burn him whilst keeping up instant-cast heals and shields.
Holy-Disc priests are also far harder to kill than a paladin, who WILL die if focused after his bubble runs out due to a silence-effect on their cast-time heals.
Not sure about the matrix, I think it's difficult to say what class is good against what even in a 1v1 situation, let alone a 3v3 situation. Perhaps a better matrix would be to have the common 3v3 or 2v2 arena set-ups and show how well they do against each other.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 4:20PM
Lancetfluke said...
As a warlock, I'd say druids are E/L, or E/W at best. A feral druid just shreds me to pieces before I can get anything more than a couple of dots off. None of our pets are particularly effective against cat form, so it's basically like fighting a rogue.
Of course, the table can't reflect all situations. If the druid unstealths behind me I'm toast, if I spot him at range then I have a decent chance of winning.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 4:24PM
disarrayed said...
Holy Priest not a pvp class? Ever heard of a Shockadin?
http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=41171
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 4:26PM
jlpknights82 said...
I personally find your chart to reflect my experiences in dueling with my 70s very well. (Warlock, Druid, and BM Hunter) Commenter 1 is likely a warrior who has had different experiences and feels the need to belittle the new guy to extend his epeen.
ANYWHO! Welcome to WoW Insider! I am a casual Arena player, and I can't wait to read some more of your columns! :D I particularly look forward to seeing what arena team designs you feel are most viable.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 4:27PM
disarrayed said...
err miss read, ignore the comment >
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 5:51PM
hpavc said...
Agreed with many of the above posters, obviously clueless. That matrix is a horrible sight.
The endless balancing of spell/abilities is more against the endless whining than the players.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 6:08PM
Xip said...
Sorry but you shouldn't write a column on such a specialised branch of PvP unless you are a PvP-God. Consider that many of your readers will have 1800+ ratings and might be ex rank 14s - people who're much more qualified than yourself. This article will annoy them because they know better; they've been there and worn the t-shirt whereas you admit to very little experience.
My advice is to rewrite this column as a beginner's PvP guide until you've done at least one season at 1800+ and are qualified to comment on high-end PvP.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 6:10PM
Jagoex said...
Considering that the lead PvP designer has stated that Warriors should be able to beat all other classes in a toe-to-toe PvP situation, I'd suggest rethinking your Warrior line of reasoning.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 6:16PM
Caleb Archon said...
In response to that matrix:
"Well, that's just like your opinion, man."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZXDJRyohOQ
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 6:51PM
Scott said...
Hunter - perhaps the class that most exemplifies 'easy to learn, hard to master'. Bestial Wrath and The Beast Within represent two of the most powerful talents a hunter can bring to the Arena. For 18 seconds - an eternity in a duel - both pet and hunter have increased DPS, and are completely immune to all forms of CC. However, diminishing returns kick in, resulting in a conspicuous dearth of hunters at higher levels of Arena combat. Line-of-sight and the dead zone have always been the hunter's Archilles' heel in close quarters combat. With the minimum range reduced to 5 yards on the PTR currently for patch 2.3, will this herald a new era in hunter PvP effectiveness?
This alone shows you have absolutely no idea on what you're talking about. The singlehanded most powerful talent for arena is Silencing shot along with Entrapment. 0/42/19 is the pvp hunter build. I know this and I'm a druid.
You have a healer on your time and a Beastial wrath hunter is a joke. You have more than 2 or 3 pieces of Glad, and they're a joke. LoS the hunter till Big Red is down, then they're worthless.
Maybe you should ACTUALLY ARENA outside the 1500 bracket before spouting off crap like that.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 7:09PM
Greengreen said...
Finally a writer for this site that I like. I have to disagree with your decisions for the warrior class. I play against the top rated players on the ptr on a regular basis and I follow the trends and news of the highest rated pvp quite a bit. It's why I play WoW, for the pvp. Especially the dueling and arena. I've dueled neilyo, affix, seraena, ming, swifte (troll mage not the Night Elf warrior), etc.
Warlocks dominate warriors. Even with the change to MS affecting their drain life abilities. I'm not talking about a warlock in 150 resilience. I'm talking about warlocks in the best gear possible. Only possible execption would be a warrior in full Black Temple resist gear which I don't have.
Despite common knowledge rogues dominate warriors. Hear me out... I'm talking about a warrior in ~pvp~ gear. Not T5-6 tanking gear. In pvp gear there's very little a warrior can do against a rogue rush down. Especially if they have prep. With the buff to hemo almost every rogue is running around with adrenaline rush and prep. A rogue can simply bum rush you with 2 evasions, 2 ARs and 2 sprints while spamming hemo. Only thing a warrior can do is overpower once every 5 seconds. In high end tanking gear the warrior has the advantage though.
I don't know why you listed shamans as a class warriors dominate. It really isn't the case. I dueled a lot of shamans both on my server and on the ptr and elemental shamans will obliterate you with instants alone. A resto shaman will slowly take away your hp and just tank your damage. I'm talking about top shamans btw. Not ones in a few epics. Even enhancement shamans are pretty rough now.
Priests can own warriors as well and so can paladins. Holy paladins own warriors. So do ret and prot pallys. And shockadins.
I know I'm coming off as whiner but it's true. Warriors have always been at the bottom of the pvp chain. Only excpetion to that is arena because of MS.
I wish this game was balanced around 1v1. It's all I care about. The excuses they've made to not do it smell like crap. "We'd have to make all classes exactly the same." No they wouldn't.
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 7:10PM
Reishi said...
The title of your blog is very similar to www.arenajunkies.com
:(
Reply
10-27-2007 @ 7:12PM
xzor said...
WoW: paper, rocks, scissor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-_WhMqMYGs
Reply